Score 41

Reviewed formulaextruded kibble

Hill's Science Diet Adult Sensitive Stomach and Sensitive Skin Chicken and Rice Recipe Dry Cat Food

Name: Hill's Science Diet Adult Sensitive Stomach and Sensitive Skin Chicken and Rice Recipe Dry Cat Food
Brand: Hill's Science Diet

Use this page when you are deciding whether this cat food deserves a closer look, a side-by-side comparison, or a deeper ingredient check. It is meant to move you from product curiosity into a clearer decision.

4.1out of 10

Decision snapshot

Built for adult maintenance

A quick read on whether this formula deserves a closer look.

Quick verdict

Best for

Cat
Adult
Dry

Not ideal for

Strict calorie-control plans
Owners specifically requiring grain-free formulas
Pets that do better on moisture-rich diets

Key highlights

Primary protein: ChickenGrain-inclusive formulaNo probiotics addedLow omega-3 support524 kcal per cup

Hill's Science Diet Adult Sensitive Stomach and Sensitive Skin Chicken and Rice Recipe Dry Cat Food

Decision toolCompare this productUse Compare when you want to weigh this formula against another realistic option.Label toolCheck a real labelUse Analyzer when ingredient order, additives, or formula signals need closer inspection.

Chicken first

524 kcal/cup

29% protein DMB

Best next actions from this product page

Open Finder Review methodology

How to use this product page for a real decision

This page is strongest when you are deciding whether this formula deserves a place in a shortlist, a direct comparison against another option, or a deeper ingredient review. It is not just a static reference page.

Use the score breakdown, ingredient panels, related needs, and linked ingredients together. The goal is to make the product easier to judge, not to imply clinical certainty from a single page.

Best next clicks from this product page

Use Compare when you want tradeoffs, Analyzer when the label needs inspection, need pages when the decision depends on a specific feeding goal, and Finder when this page sends you back into shortlist building.

Open Compare Use Analyzer Open Finder

Decision path

Use this product page as part of the wider decision system.

Product pages work best when they feed directly into comparison, label inspection, need context, and methodology review.

Decision tool

Compare this product

Move into side-by-side review when you want to weigh this formula against another realistic option.

Label tool

Check a real label

Use Analyzer when ingredient order, additives, or label signals deserve closer inspection than a summary can give.

Need context

Browse need guides

Use need pages when you want practical context before deciding whether this product belongs in the shortlist.

Trust

Review methodology

See how product scoring, ingredient interpretation, and support-aware explanation stay visible and conservative.

Page tour

How to read this analysis.

This page is dense on purpose. Follow this order if you want the shortest path from first impression to a defensible conclusion.

Skip to similar foods

Start with the verdict

Read the top summary first so you know whether this formula is promising before you get lost in the numbers.

Check the label math

Use the nutrition block to inspect protein, fat, fiber, moisture, estimated carbs, and calorie density together.

Inspect the ingredient story

Move into the ingredient interpretation panels to see whether the formula story matches the nutrient story.

Finish with context

Use the methodology and linked ingredients to understand where the numbers come from and what to verify next.

Quick verdict

Ingredient quality scores 26, nutrition balance scores 0, and safety scores 56. The formula is best interpreted as

Product score card

Ingredient quality

Nutrition balance

Digestibility

Safety

Overall

Nutrition breakdown

Metric	Value	Basis
Protein min	29	%
Fat min	17	%
Fiber max	3	%
Moisture max	10	%
Ash	0	%
Estimated carbs (as fed)	0	%
Estimated carbs (dry matter)	0	%
Protein dry matter	29	%
Fat dry matter	17	%
Calories	0	kcal/kg
Calories per cup	524	kcal/cup
kcal per 100g	0	kcal

Calorie density analysis

Calories per cup

524

Protein per 1000 kcal

Fat per 1000 kcal

Estimated glycemic load

Not estimated

This is a more calorie-dense formula for its format. Its macro energy profile is best judged alongside fit scores rather than calories alone.

Ingredient breakdown by role

Protein sources

Chicken, Corn Gluten Meal, Chicken Fat, Chicken Meal, Chicken Liver Flavor

Carbohydrate sources

Brewers Rice, Oat Fiber

Fat sources

Chicken Fat, Soybean Oil

Functional additives

Whole Grain Corn, Chicken Fat, Egg Product, Chicken Liver Flavor, Lactic Acid, L-Lysine, Potassium Chloride, Choline Chloride, Fructooligosaccharides, Iodized Salt, DL-Methionine, Taurine, Vitamins, Calcium Carbonate, L-Tryptophan, Minerals, Mixed Tocopherols for freshness, Natural Flavors, Beta-Carotene

Ingredient interpretation

Positive ingredient signals: Named animal protein.

The label is anchored by these protein contributors: Chicken, Corn Gluten Meal, Chicken Fat, Chicken Meal, Chicken Liver Flavor.

Watch-outs on this label: Filler presence, Legume presence, Legume presence signal, Plant protein concentrate, Protein inflation signal.

Support boundary

Ingredient signals now carry conservative claim mapping so analyzer, product, and need surfaces can distinguish source-backed interpretation from internal scoring policy.

Signal presence and score effects are separate. Support mapping describes interpretation framing, not the validity of the score impact.

Partially supported: 2. Internal methodology: 3. Unresolved: 0.

Ingredient quality

Digestibility

Safety

Ingredient deck

Chicken, Brewers Rice, Corn Gluten Meal, Whole Grain Corn, Chicken Fat, Chicken Meal, Egg Product, Chicken Liver Flavor, Soybean Oil, Lactic Acid, Oat Fiber, L-Lysine, Potassium Chloride, Choline Chloride, Fructooligosaccharides, Iodized Salt, DL-Methionine, Taurine, Vitamins, Calcium Carbonate, L-Tryptophan, Minerals, Mixed Tocopherols for freshness, Natural Flavors, Beta-Carotene.

Ingredient signals visualization

Filler presence

caution

Filler-leaning ingredients can dilute nutritional intent and reduce formula clarity.

Internal methodologyRefs 2

low

Internal methodology only because broad 'filler' language is not a strong scientific category; it is used here as a conservative label-review cue rather than an evidence-backed verdict.

Quality claims review [ext]Ingredient rules

This should not be read as proof that a formula is unsuitable.

Matched ingredients: Brewers Rice, Corn Gluten Meal

IQ -6Digestibility -4Safety -2

Legume presence

caution

Legume-heavy formulas deserve closer interpretation when they materially shape the ingredient deck.

Internal methodologyRefs 1

low

Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.

Ingredient rules

Presence alone should not be overstated.

Matched ingredients: Soybean Oil

IQ -4Digestibility -3Safety -1

Legume presence signal

caution

Legumes are materially present in the ingredient deck and should be interpreted in context.

Internal methodologyRefs 1

low

Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.

Ingredient rules

Presence alone should not be overstated.

Matched ingredients: Soybean Oil

IQ -4Digestibility -2Safety 0

Named animal protein

positive

The ingredient deck clearly includes named animal protein rather than relying on vague animal terms.

Partially supportedRefs 3

moderate

Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance and professional review norms support the direction of this interpretation, but the exact signal effect is internal.

WSAVA toolkit [ext]Label discrepancy review [ext]Ingredient rules

This is a transparency interpretation, not proof of superior health outcomes.

Matched ingredients: Chicken

IQ +6Digestibility +2Safety +2

Plant protein concentrate

caution

Plant protein concentrates can inflate crude protein impressions without matching animal-protein quality.

Partially supportedRefs 2

low

Partially supported because label-interpretation concerns are literature-informed, but the importance assigned to this signal is still internal methodology.

Label discrepancy review [ext]Ingredient rules

This is not proof that a product is nutritionally poor.

Matched ingredients: Corn Gluten Meal

IQ -8Digestibility -3Safety -1

Protein inflation signal

caution

This label includes a plant protein concentrate that may inflate the apparent protein story.

Internal methodologyRefs 1

low

Internal methodology only at this stage because the interpretation is used as a conservative review flag, not as a source-backed outcome claim.

Ingredient rules

The presence of this flag should trigger closer reading, not a definitive judgment.

Matched ingredients: Corn Gluten Meal

IQ -8Digestibility -2Safety 0

Functional nutrients

Omega-3

Omega-6

Taurine

Calcium

Phosphorus

Magnesium

No explicit probiotic strain disclosure is present in this mock product.

Suitability and fit

Sensitive stomach

Weight management

Puppy fit

Senior fit

Allergy support

Ingredients connected to this formula

Methodology note

Hill's Science Diet Adult Sensitive Stomach and Sensitive Skin Chicken and Rice Recipe Dry Cat Food is formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Cat Food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance of adult cats.

The page combines raw guaranteed-analysis style values with derived estimates such as dry matter protein, carbohydrate estimate, ingredient transparency, glycemic load, digestibility interpretation, and need-fit scoring.

Useful benchmark for condition-aware retail formulas.