Official-source record. Source: https://www.purina.com/sites/default/files/product-label-deck-file/2026-01/4620_u462025_pro_plan_adult_weight_mgt_chicken_rice_dry_cat_food_s55.pdf
Decision focus
Source-listed facts
Use the listed species, life stage, food type, nutrition basics, ingredients, and source completeness without inferring a score.
Decision focus
This page keeps public scores separate from source facts, so the current decision should focus on listed nutrition, ingredients, and data confidence.
Score display
N/A
Source and field completeness
Reflects source, label, nutrition, and optional nutrient data completeness only. It is not a product quality score.
Data confidence reflects source completeness, not a nutrition rating.
Fit gate: matched. Public product scores remain separate from this data confidence badge.
Data confidence reflects source completeness, not product quality.
These are the core label facts to compare first. N/A means the value was not listed on the official source.
| Metric | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 43 | % min |
| Fat | 9 | % min |
| Fiber | 5 | % max |
| Moisture | 12 | % max |
| Calories | 3443 | kcal/kg |
| Calories per cup | 353 | kcal/cup |
The ingredient deck is shown as a source fact. Role mapping and interpretation only appear when source-backed data is available.
Ingredient deck
Chicken, corn protein meal, poultry by-product meal, soybean meal, rice, whole grain wheat, corn germ meal, and vitamins/minerals.
Primary ingredient facts
Mapped notes
Protein sources
Chicken, corn protein meal, poultry by-product meal, soybean meal, corn germ meal
Carbohydrate sources
rice
Functional additives
whole grain wheat, and vitamins/minerals
Positive ingredient signals: Named animal protein.
The label is anchored by these protein contributors: Chicken, corn protein meal, poultry by-product meal, soybean meal, corn germ meal.
Evidence profile pending. Linked ingredient pages are not mapped for this product yet.
Use Compare when this product is one of two or more realistic options.
These sections stay collapsed because they depend on calculated analysis, evidence mapping, or optional label fields.
Calories per cup
353
Protein per 1000 kcal
124.9
Fat per 1000 kcal
26.1
Estimated glycemic load
N/A
Not listed on the official source.
This is a moderate-density formula for its format.
The official data currently marks probiotic support as not present.
Generic animal terms weaken transparency because the source material is less clear.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance supports caution around vague sourcing, while the severity of the penalty remains internal methodology.
Matched ingredients: poultry by-product meal
Legume-heavy formulas deserve closer interpretation when they materially shape the ingredient deck.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: soybean meal
Legumes are materially present in the ingredient deck and should be interpreted in context.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: soybean meal
The ingredient deck clearly includes named animal protein rather than relying on vague animal terms.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance and professional review norms support the direction of this interpretation, but the exact signal effect is internal.
Matched ingredients: Chicken
Plant protein concentrates can inflate crude protein impressions without matching animal-protein quality.
Partially supported because label-interpretation concerns are literature-informed, but the importance assigned to this signal is still internal methodology.
Matched ingredients: corn protein meal
This label includes a plant protein concentrate that may inflate the apparent protein story.
Internal methodology only at this stage because the interpretation is used as a conservative review flag, not as a source-backed outcome claim.
Matched ingredients: corn protein meal
The ingredient panel includes vague generic animal terminology that weakens transparency.
Partially supported because vague ingredient naming can reasonably weaken transparency confidence, while the downstream impact remains internal.
Matched ingredients: poultry by-product meal
Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Cat Food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance of adult cats.
Useful benchmark brand with transparent product segmentation.
Royal Canin
Royal Canin
Royal Canin